Wednesday 2 April 2014

The Economist on patents and patent trolls

http://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21598321-intellectual-property-after-being-blamed-stymying-innovation-america-vague
In an article of the Economist, the use of patents is discussed, particularly in business methods or software. Besides a good analysis of the current (US) situation regarding the practice of patent trolls and the legal issues related to broad patents claims, the article also discusses the role of patents as a metric of innovation:

"...patent issuance is a poor measure of innovation. Patenting is strictly a metric of invention. Innovation is such a vastly different endeavour—in terms of investment, time and the human resources required—as to be virtually unrelated to invention."

I whish more people recognizes this is the case. Unfortunately it is still common practice to include patents as a metric of innovation, often with the justification that we don't have any better. Since it is very unclear whether patents are positively, negatively or not correlated to innovation it would be equally justified to include any other random indicator as a metric of innovation. For example the share of population being left-handed with blue eyes and dark hair.

Read the whole article of The Economist here

Image: Jac Depczyk

No comments:

Post a Comment